first version of the knowledge base :)
This commit is contained in:
65
00 - About/design-principles.md
Normal file
65
00 - About/design-principles.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Design Principles
|
||||
description: Architectural and operational design principles used to shape Den Vault content and the systems it describes
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- about
|
||||
- design
|
||||
- architecture
|
||||
category: about
|
||||
created: 2026-03-14
|
||||
updated: 2026-03-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Den Vault favors design principles that make systems easier to understand, operate, and recover. These principles apply to both the infrastructure being documented and the way documentation itself is structured.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why it matters
|
||||
|
||||
Without stable design principles, infrastructure turns into a collection of local optimizations that are difficult to audit and harder to maintain. Shared principles make it easier to evaluate tools, architecture choices, and documentation quality consistently.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core concepts
|
||||
|
||||
- Systems should be understandable by inspection
|
||||
- Keep it durable: back up, migrate, repair, and replace
|
||||
- Leave room for care in interfaces, naming, and operational ergonomics
|
||||
- Stay practical when choosing tradeoffs and tooling
|
||||
- Clear trust boundaries
|
||||
- Minimal exposed surface area
|
||||
- Declarative configuration where possible
|
||||
- Explicit ownership of data, identity, and ingress paths
|
||||
- Observability and recovery designed in from the start
|
||||
|
||||
## Practical usage
|
||||
|
||||
These principles usually lead to patterns such as:
|
||||
|
||||
- Private administrative access through VPN or dedicated management networks
|
||||
- Reverse proxies and DNS as shared platform services
|
||||
- Container and VM workloads with documented persistence boundaries
|
||||
- Backup and restore strategy treated as a design requirement
|
||||
- Low-dependency site and service architecture when that improves long-term maintainability
|
||||
|
||||
## Best practices
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer one clear pattern over multiple overlapping ones
|
||||
- Keep the path of a request or dependency easy to trace
|
||||
- Design around failure domains, not only nominal behavior
|
||||
- Make operational boundaries visible in diagrams, inventory, and docs
|
||||
- Treat usability and readability as part of technical quality
|
||||
|
||||
## Pitfalls
|
||||
|
||||
- Mixing management, storage, and user traffic without a reasoned boundary
|
||||
- Depending on defaults without documenting them
|
||||
- Building fragile chains of dependencies for simple services
|
||||
- Adding security controls that cannot be operated consistently
|
||||
- Making systems colder, more complex, or more abstract than the problem requires
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Twelve-Factor App](https://12factor.net/)
|
||||
- [NGINX: Reverse Proxy](https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/web-server/reverse-proxy/)
|
||||
- [Prometheus overview](https://prometheus.io/docs/introduction/overview/)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user