first version of the knowledge base :)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Service Architecture Patterns
|
||||
description: Common service architecture patterns for self-hosted platforms and small engineering environments
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- architecture
|
||||
- services
|
||||
- infrastructure
|
||||
category: infrastructure
|
||||
created: 2026-03-14
|
||||
updated: 2026-03-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Service Architecture Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Service architecture patterns describe how applications are packaged, connected, exposed, and operated. In self-hosted environments, the most useful patterns balance simplicity, isolation, and operability rather than chasing scale for its own sake.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why it matters
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture decisions affect deployment complexity, failure domains, recovery steps, and long-term maintenance. Small environments benefit from choosing patterns that remain understandable without full-time platform engineering overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core concepts
|
||||
|
||||
- Single-service deployment: one service per VM or container stack
|
||||
- Shared platform services: DNS, reverse proxy, monitoring, identity, backups
|
||||
- Stateful versus stateless workloads
|
||||
- Explicit ingress, persistence, and dependency boundaries
|
||||
- Loose coupling through DNS, reverse proxies, and documented interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
## Practical usage
|
||||
|
||||
Useful patterns for self-hosted systems include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reverse proxy plus multiple backend services
|
||||
- Dedicated database service with application separation
|
||||
- Utility VMs or containers for platform services
|
||||
- Private admin interfaces with public application ingress kept separate
|
||||
|
||||
Example dependency view:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Client -> Reverse proxy -> Application -> Database
|
||||
-> Identity provider
|
||||
-> Monitoring and logs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best practices
|
||||
|
||||
- Keep stateful services isolated and clearly backed up
|
||||
- Make ingress paths and dependencies easy to trace
|
||||
- Reuse shared platform services where they reduce duplication
|
||||
- Prefer a small number of well-understood patterns across the environment
|
||||
|
||||
## Pitfalls
|
||||
|
||||
- Putting every service into one giant stack with unclear boundaries
|
||||
- Mixing public ingress and administrative paths without review
|
||||
- Scaling architecture complexity before operational need exists
|
||||
- Depending on undocumented local assumptions between services
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [Martin Fowler: MonolithFirst](https://martinfowler.com/bliki/MonolithFirst.html)
|
||||
- [The Twelve-Factor App](https://12factor.net/)
|
||||
- [NGINX: Reverse Proxy](https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/web-server/reverse-proxy/)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user