first commit
This commit is contained in:
82
docs/future_roadmap.md
Normal file
82
docs/future_roadmap.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Future Features Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the strategic plan for evolving the AI Code Review system. These features are proposed for future implementation to enhance security coverage, context awareness, and user interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Advanced Security Scanning
|
||||
|
||||
Expand the current 17-rule regex scanner with dedicated industry-standard tools for **Static Application Security Testing (SAST)** and **Software Composition Analysis (SCA)**.
|
||||
|
||||
### Proposed Integrations
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Type | Purpose | Implementation Plan |
|
||||
|------|------|---------|---------------------|
|
||||
| **Bandit** | SAST | Analyze Python code for common vulnerability patterns (e.g., `exec`, weak crypto). | Run `bandit -r . -f json` and parse results into the review report. |
|
||||
| **Semgrep** | SAST | Polyglot scanning with custom rule support. | Integrate `semgrep --config=p/security-audit` for broader language support (JS, Go, Java). |
|
||||
| **Safety** | SCA | Check installed dependencies against known vulnerability databases. | Run `safety check --json` during CI to flag vulnerable packages in `requirements.txt`. |
|
||||
| **Trivy** | SCA/Container | Scan container images (Dockerfiles) and filesystem. | Add a workflow step to run Trivy for container-based projects. |
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** significantly reduces false negatives and covers dependency chain risks (Supply Chain Security).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: "Chat with Codebase" (RAG)
|
||||
|
||||
Move beyond single-file context by implementing **Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)**. This allows the AI to answer questions like *"Where is authentication handled?"* by searching the entire codebase semantically.
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Vector Database:**
|
||||
* **ChromaDB** or **Qdrant**: Lightweight, open-source choices for storing code embeddings.
|
||||
2. **Embeddings Model:**
|
||||
* **OpenAI `text-embedding-3-small`** or **FastEmbed**: To convert code chunks (functions/classes) into vectors.
|
||||
3. **Workflow:**
|
||||
* **Index:** Run a nightly job to parse the codebase -> chunk it -> embed it -> store in Vector DB.
|
||||
* **Query:** When `@ai-bot` receives a question, convert the question to a vector -> search Vector DB -> inject relevant snippets into the LLM prompt.
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** Enables high-accuracy architectural advice and deep-dive explanations spanning multiple files.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Interactive Code Repair
|
||||
|
||||
Transform the bot from a passive reviewer into an active collaborator.
|
||||
|
||||
### Features
|
||||
|
||||
* **`@ai-bot apply <suggestion_id>`**:
|
||||
* The bot generates a secure `git patch` for a specific recommendation.
|
||||
* The system commits the patch directly to the PR branch.
|
||||
* **Refactoring Assistance**:
|
||||
* Command: `@ai-bot refactor this function to use dependency injection`.
|
||||
* Bot proposes the changed code block and offers to commit it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk Mitigation:**
|
||||
* Require human approval (comment reply) before any commit is pushed.
|
||||
* Run tests automatically after bot commits.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Enterprise Dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
Provide a high-level view of engineering health across the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
### Metrics to Visualize
|
||||
|
||||
* **Security Health:** Trend of High/Critical issues over time.
|
||||
* **Code Quality:** Technical debt accumulation vs. reduction rate.
|
||||
* **Review Velocity:** Average time to AI review vs. Human review.
|
||||
* **Bot Usage:** Most frequent commands and value-add interactions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tech Stack
|
||||
* **Prometheus** (already implemented) + **Grafana**: For time-series tracking.
|
||||
* **Streamlit** / **Next.js**: For a custom management console to configure rules and view logs.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Immediate Win:** Implement **Bandit** integration. It is low-effort (Python library) and high-value (detects real vulnerabilities).
|
||||
2. **High Impact:** **Safety** dependency scanning. Vulnerable dependencies are the #1 attack vector for modern apps.
|
||||
3. **Long Term:** Work on **Vector DB** integration only after the core review logic is flawless, as it introduces significant infrastructure complexity.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user