CLAUDE.md

@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ Key workflow pattern:
 Prompts are stored in `tools/ai-review/prompts/` as Markdown files:
 
 - `base.md` - Base instructions for all reviews
+- `pr_summary.md` - PR summary generation template
 - `issue_triage.md` - Issue classification template
 - `issue_response.md` - Issue response template
 
@@ -407,6 +408,59 @@ pytest tests/test_ai_review.py::TestSecurityScanner -v
 
 ## Common Development Tasks
 
+### PR Summary Generation
+
+The PR summary feature automatically generates comprehensive summaries for pull requests.
+
+**Key Features:**
+- Auto-generates summary for PRs with empty descriptions
+- Can be manually triggered with `@codebot summarize` in PR comments
+- Analyzes diff to extract key changes, files affected, and impact
+- Categorizes change type (Feature/Bugfix/Refactor/Documentation/Testing)
+- Posts as comment or updates PR description (configurable)
+
+**Implementation Details:**
+
+1. **Auto-Summary on PR Open** - `PRAgent.execute()`:
+   - Checks if PR body is empty and `auto_summary.enabled` is true
+   - Calls `_generate_pr_summary()` automatically
+   - Continues with normal PR review after posting summary
+
+2. **Manual Trigger** - `@codebot summarize` in PR comments:
+   - `PRAgent.can_handle()` detects `summarize` command in PR comments
+   - Routes to `_handle_summarize_command()`
+   - Generates and posts summary on demand
+
+3. **Summary Generation** - `_generate_pr_summary()`:
+   - Fetches PR diff using `_get_diff()`
+   - Loads `prompts/pr_summary.md` template
+   - Calls LLM with diff to analyze changes
+   - Returns structured JSON with summary data
+   - Formats using `_format_pr_summary()`
+   - Posts as comment or updates description based on config
+
+4. **Configuration** - `config.yml`:
+   ```yaml
+   agents:
+     pr:
+       auto_summary:
+         enabled: true  # Auto-generate for empty PRs
+         post_as_comment: true  # true = comment, false = update description
+   ```
+
+**Summary Structure:**
+- Brief 2-3 sentence overview
+- Change type categorization (Feature/Bugfix/Refactor/etc)
+- Key changes (Added/Modified/Removed)
+- Files affected with descriptions
+- Impact assessment (scope: small/medium/large)
+
+**Common Use Cases:**
+- Developers who forget to write PR descriptions
+- Quick understanding of complex changes
+- Standardized documentation format
+- Pre-review context for reviewers
+
 ### Review-Again Command Implementation
 
 The `@codebot review-again` command allows manual re-triggering of PR reviews without new commits.
@@ -463,6 +517,7 @@ Example commands:
 - `@codebot triage` - Full issue triage with labeling
 - `@codebot explain` - Explain the issue
 - `@codebot suggest` - Suggest solutions
+- `@codebot summarize` - Generate PR summary or issue summary (works on both)
 - `@codebot setup-labels` - Automatic label setup (built-in, not in config)
 - `@codebot review-again` - Re-run PR review without new commits (PR comments only)
 

README.md

@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@ Enterprise-grade AI code review system for **Gitea** with automated PR review, i
 | Feature | Description |
 |---------|-------------|
 | **PR Review** | Inline comments, security scanning, severity-based CI failure |
+| **PR Summaries** | Auto-generate comprehensive PR summaries with change analysis and impact assessment |
 | **Issue Triage** | On-demand classification, labeling, priority assignment via `@codebot triage` |
 | **Chat** | Interactive AI chat with codebase search and web search tools |
-| **@codebot Commands** | `@codebot summarize`, `explain`, `suggest`, `triage` in issue comments |
+| **@codebot Commands** | `@codebot summarize`, `explain`, `suggest`, `triage`, `review-again` in comments |
 | **Codebase Analysis** | Health scores, tech debt tracking, weekly reports |
 | **Security Scanner** | 17 OWASP-aligned rules for vulnerability detection |
 | **Enterprise Ready** | Audit logging, metrics, Prometheus export |
@@ -189,8 +190,51 @@ In any PR comment:
 
 | Command | Description |
 |---------|-------------|
+| `@codebot summarize` | Generate a comprehensive PR summary with changes, files affected, and impact |
 | `@codebot review-again` | Re-run AI code review on current PR state without new commits |
 
+#### PR Summary (`@codebot summarize`)
+
+**Features:**
+- 📋 Generates structured summary of PR changes
+- ✨ Categorizes change type (Feature/Bugfix/Refactor/Documentation/Testing)
+- 📝 Lists what was added, modified, and removed
+- 📁 Shows all affected files with descriptions
+- 🎯 Assesses impact scope (small/medium/large)
+- 🤖 Automatically generates on PRs with empty descriptions
+
+**When to use:**
+- When a PR lacks a description
+- To quickly understand what changed
+- For standardized PR documentation
+- Before reviewing complex PRs
+
+**Example output:**
+```markdown
+## 📋 Pull Request Summary
+This PR implements automatic PR summary generation...
+
+**Type:** ✨ Feature
+
+## Changes
+✅ Added:
+- PR summary generation in PRAgent
+- Auto-summary for empty PR descriptions
+
+📝 Modified:
+- Updated config.yml with new settings
+
+## Files Affected
+- ➕ `tools/ai-review/prompts/pr_summary.md` - New prompt template
+- 📝 `tools/ai-review/agents/pr_agent.py` - Added summary methods
+
+## Impact
+🟡 **Scope:** Medium
+Adds new feature without affecting existing functionality
+```
+
+#### Review Again (`@codebot review-again`)
+
 **Features:**
 - ✅ Shows diff from previous review (resolved/new/changed issues)
 - 🏷️ Updates labels based on new severity

tests/test_ai_review.py

@@ -588,5 +588,242 @@ class TestLabelSetup:
         assert "Kind/Bug" in config["aliases"]
 
 
+class TestPRSummaryGeneration:
+    """Test PR summary generation functionality."""
+
+    def test_pr_summary_prompt_exists(self):
+        """Verify pr_summary.md prompt file exists."""
+        prompt_path = os.path.join(
+            os.path.dirname(__file__),
+            "..",
+            "tools",
+            "ai-review",
+            "prompts",
+            "pr_summary.md",
+        )
+        assert os.path.exists(prompt_path), "pr_summary.md prompt file not found"
+
+    def test_pr_summary_prompt_formatting(self):
+        """Test that pr_summary.md can be loaded without errors."""
+        prompt_path = os.path.join(
+            os.path.dirname(__file__),
+            "..",
+            "tools",
+            "ai-review",
+            "prompts",
+            "pr_summary.md",
+        )
+        with open(prompt_path) as f:
+            prompt = f.read()
+
+        # Check for key elements
+        assert "summary" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "change_type" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "files_affected" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "impact" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "JSON" in prompt
+
+        # Verify JSON examples use double curly braces (escaped)
+        # Should not raise KeyError when formatted with empty string
+        try:
+            formatted = prompt.format()
+        except KeyError as e:
+            pytest.fail(f"Prompt has unescaped placeholders: {e}")
+
+    def test_pr_agent_has_summary_marker(self):
+        """Verify PRAgent has PR_SUMMARY_MARKER constant."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        assert hasattr(PRAgent, "PR_SUMMARY_MARKER")
+        assert PRAgent.PR_SUMMARY_MARKER == "<!-- AI_PR_SUMMARY -->"
+
+    def test_pr_agent_can_handle_summarize_command(self):
+        """Test that PRAgent can handle @codebot summarize in PR comments."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        config = {
+            "agents": {
+                "pr": {
+                    "enabled": True,
+                }
+            },
+            "interaction": {
+                "mention_prefix": "@codebot",
+            },
+        }
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config=config)
+
+        # Test summarize command in PR comment
+        event_data = {
+            "action": "created",
+            "issue": {
+                "number": 123,
+                "pull_request": {},  # Indicates this is a PR
+            },
+            "comment": {
+                "body": "@codebot summarize this PR please",
+            },
+        }
+
+        assert agent.can_handle("issue_comment", event_data) is True
+
+    def test_pr_agent_can_handle_summarize_case_insensitive(self):
+        """Test that summarize command is case-insensitive."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        config = {
+            "agents": {
+                "pr": {
+                    "enabled": True,
+                }
+            },
+            "interaction": {
+                "mention_prefix": "@codebot",
+            },
+        }
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config=config)
+
+        # Test various casings
+        for body in [
+            "@codebot SUMMARIZE",
+            "@codebot Summarize",
+            "@codebot SuMmArIzE",
+        ]:
+            event_data = {
+                "action": "created",
+                "issue": {
+                    "number": 123,
+                    "pull_request": {},
+                },
+                "comment": {"body": body},
+            }
+            assert agent.can_handle("issue_comment", event_data) is True
+
+    def test_pr_agent_ignores_summarize_on_non_pr(self):
+        """Test that summarize command is ignored on regular issues."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        config = {
+            "agents": {
+                "pr": {
+                    "enabled": True,
+                }
+            },
+            "interaction": {
+                "mention_prefix": "@codebot",
+            },
+        }
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config=config)
+
+        # Regular issue (no pull_request field)
+        event_data = {
+            "action": "created",
+            "issue": {
+                "number": 123,
+                # No pull_request field
+            },
+            "comment": {
+                "body": "@codebot summarize",
+            },
+        }
+
+        assert agent.can_handle("issue_comment", event_data) is False
+
+    def test_format_pr_summary_structure(self):
+        """Test _format_pr_summary generates correct markdown structure."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config={})
+
+        summary_data = {
+            "summary": "This PR adds a new feature",
+            "change_type": "Feature",
+            "key_changes": {
+                "added": ["New authentication module", "User login endpoint"],
+                "modified": ["Updated config file"],
+                "removed": ["Deprecated legacy auth"],
+            },
+            "files_affected": [
+                {
+                    "path": "src/auth.py",
+                    "description": "New authentication module",
+                    "change_type": "added",
+                },
+                {
+                    "path": "config.yml",
+                    "description": "Added auth settings",
+                    "change_type": "modified",
+                },
+            ],
+            "impact": {
+                "scope": "medium",
+                "description": "Adds authentication without breaking existing features",
+            },
+        }
+
+        result = agent._format_pr_summary(summary_data)
+
+        # Verify structure
+        assert "## 📋 Pull Request Summary" in result
+        assert "This PR adds a new feature" in result
+        assert "**Type:** ✨ Feature" in result
+        assert "## Changes" in result
+        assert "**✅ Added:**" in result
+        assert "**📝 Modified:**" in result
+        assert "**❌ Removed:**" in result
+        assert "## Files Affected" in result
+        assert "➕ `src/auth.py`" in result
+        assert "📝 `config.yml`" in result
+        assert "## Impact" in result
+        assert "🟡 **Scope:** Medium" in result
+
+    def test_format_pr_summary_change_types(self):
+        """Test that all change types have correct emojis."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config={})
+
+        change_types = {
+            "Feature": "✨",
+            "Bugfix": "🐛",
+            "Refactor": "♻️",
+            "Documentation": "📚",
+            "Testing": "🧪",
+            "Mixed": "🔀",
+        }
+
+        for change_type, expected_emoji in change_types.items():
+            summary_data = {
+                "summary": "Test",
+                "change_type": change_type,
+                "key_changes": {},
+                "files_affected": [],
+                "impact": {},
+            }
+
+            result = agent._format_pr_summary(summary_data)
+            assert f"**Type:** {expected_emoji} {change_type}" in result
+
+    def test_config_has_auto_summary_settings(self):
+        """Verify config.yml has auto_summary configuration."""
+        config_path = os.path.join(
+            os.path.dirname(__file__), "..", "tools", "ai-review", "config.yml"
+        )
+
+        import yaml
+
+        with open(config_path) as f:
+            config = yaml.safe_load(f)
+
+        assert "agents" in config
+        assert "pr" in config["agents"]
+        assert "auto_summary" in config["agents"]["pr"]
+        assert "enabled" in config["agents"]["pr"]["auto_summary"]
+        assert "post_as_comment" in config["agents"]["pr"]["auto_summary"]
+
+
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     pytest.main([__file__, "-v"])

tools/ai-review/agents/pr_agent.py

@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
 
     # Marker specific to PR reviews
     PR_AI_MARKER = "<!-- AI_PR_REVIEW -->"
+    PR_SUMMARY_MARKER = "<!-- AI_PR_SUMMARY -->"
 
     def _get_label_config(self, category: str, key: str) -> dict:
         """Get full label configuration from config.
@@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
             allowed_events = agent_config.get("events", ["opened", "synchronize"])
             return action in allowed_events
 
-        # Handle issue comments on PRs (for review-again command)
+        # Handle issue comments on PRs (for review-again and summarize commands)
         if event_type == "issue_comment":
             action = event_data.get("action", "")
             if action == "created":
@@ -91,21 +92,29 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
                 mention_prefix = self.config.get("interaction", {}).get(
                     "mention_prefix", "@codebot"
                 )
-                # Only handle if this is a PR and contains review-again command
+                # Only handle if this is a PR
                 issue = event_data.get("issue", {})
                 is_pr = issue.get("pull_request") is not None
                 has_review_again = (
                     f"{mention_prefix} review-again" in comment_body.lower()
                 )
-                return is_pr and has_review_again
+                has_summarize = f"{mention_prefix} summarize" in comment_body.lower()
+                return is_pr and (has_review_again or has_summarize)
 
         return False
 
     def execute(self, context: AgentContext) -> AgentResult:
         """Execute the PR review agent."""
-        # Check if this is a review-again command
+        # Check if this is a comment-based command
         if context.event_type == "issue_comment":
-            return self._handle_review_again(context)
+            comment_body = context.event_data.get("comment", {}).get("body", "")
+            mention_prefix = self.config.get("interaction", {}).get(
+                "mention_prefix", "@codebot"
+            )
+            if f"{mention_prefix} summarize" in comment_body.lower():
+                return self._handle_summarize_command(context)
+            elif f"{mention_prefix} review-again" in comment_body.lower():
+                return self._handle_review_again(context)
 
         pr = context.event_data.get("pull_request", {})
         pr_number = pr.get("number")
@@ -114,6 +123,24 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
 
         actions_taken = []
 
+        # Check if PR has empty description and auto-summary is enabled
+        pr_body = pr.get("body", "").strip()
+        agent_config = self.config.get("agents", {}).get("pr", {})
+        auto_summary_enabled = agent_config.get("auto_summary", {}).get("enabled", True)
+
+        if (
+            not pr_body
+            and auto_summary_enabled
+            and context.event_data.get("action") == "opened"
+        ):
+            # Generate and post summary for empty PR descriptions
+            summary_result = self._generate_pr_summary(
+                context.owner, context.repo, pr_number
+            )
+            if summary_result:
+                actions_taken.append("Generated PR summary for empty description")
+                # Don't return here - continue with regular review
+
         # Step 1: Get PR diff
         diff = self._get_diff(context.owner, context.repo, pr_number)
         if not diff.strip():
@@ -791,3 +818,206 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
                 self.logger.warning(f"Failed to add labels: {e}")
 
         return []
+
+    def _generate_pr_summary(self, owner: str, repo: str, pr_number: int) -> bool:
+        """Generate and post a summary for a PR.
+
+        Args:
+            owner: Repository owner
+            repo: Repository name
+            pr_number: PR number
+
+        Returns:
+            True if summary was generated successfully, False otherwise
+        """
+        try:
+            # Get PR diff
+            diff = self._get_diff(owner, repo, pr_number)
+            if not diff.strip():
+                self.logger.info(f"No diff to summarize for PR #{pr_number}")
+                return False
+
+            # Load summary prompt
+            prompt_template = self.load_prompt("pr_summary")
+            prompt = f"{prompt_template}\n{diff}"
+
+            # Call LLM to generate summary
+            result = self.call_llm_json(prompt)
+
+            # Format the summary comment
+            summary_comment = self._format_pr_summary(result)
+
+            # Post as first comment (or update PR description based on config)
+            agent_config = self.config.get("agents", {}).get("pr", {})
+            auto_summary_config = agent_config.get("auto_summary", {})
+            post_as_comment = auto_summary_config.get("post_as_comment", True)
+
+            if post_as_comment:
+                # Post as comment
+                self.gitea.create_issue_comment(owner, repo, pr_number, summary_comment)
+                self.logger.info(f"Posted PR summary as comment for PR #{pr_number}")
+            else:
+                # Update PR description (requires different API call)
+                # Note: Gitea API may not support updating PR description
+                # In that case, fall back to posting as comment
+                try:
+                    self.gitea.update_pull_request(
+                        owner, repo, pr_number, body=summary_comment
+                    )
+                    self.logger.info(
+                        f"Updated PR description with summary for PR #{pr_number}"
+                    )
+                except Exception as e:
+                    self.logger.warning(
+                        f"Could not update PR description, posting as comment: {e}"
+                    )
+                    self.gitea.create_issue_comment(
+                        owner, repo, pr_number, summary_comment
+                    )
+
+            return True
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            self.logger.error(f"Failed to generate PR summary: {e}")
+            return False
+
+    def _format_pr_summary(self, summary_data: dict) -> str:
+        """Format the PR summary data into a readable comment.
+
+        Args:
+            summary_data: JSON data from LLM containing summary information
+
+        Returns:
+            Formatted markdown comment
+        """
+        lines = [
+            self.AI_DISCLAIMER,
+            "",
+            "## 📋 Pull Request Summary",
+            "",
+            summary_data.get("summary", "Summary unavailable"),
+            "",
+        ]
+
+        # Change type
+        change_type = summary_data.get("change_type", "Unknown")
+        change_type_emoji = {
+            "Feature": "✨",
+            "Bugfix": "🐛",
+            "Refactor": "♻️",
+            "Documentation": "📚",
+            "Testing": "🧪",
+            "Mixed": "🔀",
+        }
+        emoji = change_type_emoji.get(change_type, "🔀")
+        lines.append(f"**Type:** {emoji} {change_type}")
+        lines.append("")
+
+        # Key changes
+        key_changes = summary_data.get("key_changes", {})
+        if key_changes:
+            lines.append("## Changes")
+            lines.append("")
+
+            added = key_changes.get("added", [])
+            if added:
+                lines.append("**✅ Added:**")
+                for item in added:
+                    lines.append(f"- {item}")
+                lines.append("")
+
+            modified = key_changes.get("modified", [])
+            if modified:
+                lines.append("**📝 Modified:**")
+                for item in modified:
+                    lines.append(f"- {item}")
+                lines.append("")
+
+            removed = key_changes.get("removed", [])
+            if removed:
+                lines.append("**❌ Removed:**")
+                for item in removed:
+                    lines.append(f"- {item}")
+                lines.append("")
+
+        # Files affected
+        files = summary_data.get("files_affected", [])
+        if files:
+            lines.append("## Files Affected")
+            lines.append("")
+            for file_info in files[:10]:  # Limit to first 10 files
+                path = file_info.get("path", "unknown")
+                desc = file_info.get("description", "")
+                change_type = file_info.get("change_type", "modified")
+
+                type_icon = {"added": "➕", "modified": "📝", "deleted": "➖"}
+                icon = type_icon.get(change_type, "📝")
+
+                lines.append(f"- {icon} `{path}` - {desc}")
+
+            if len(files) > 10:
+                lines.append(f"- ... and {len(files) - 10} more files")
+            lines.append("")
+
+        # Impact assessment
+        impact = summary_data.get("impact", {})
+        if impact:
+            scope = impact.get("scope", "unknown")
+            description = impact.get("description", "")
+
+            scope_emoji = {"small": "🟢", "medium": "🟡", "large": "🔴"}
+            emoji = scope_emoji.get(scope, "⚪")
+
+            lines.append("## Impact")
+            lines.append(f"{emoji} **Scope:** {scope.capitalize()}")
+            lines.append(f"{description}")
+
+        return "\n".join(lines)
+
+    def _handle_summarize_command(self, context: AgentContext) -> AgentResult:
+        """Handle @codebot summarize command from PR comments.
+
+        Args:
+            context: Agent context with event data
+
+        Returns:
+            AgentResult with success status and actions taken
+        """
+        issue = context.event_data.get("issue", {})
+        pr_number = issue.get("number")
+        comment_author = (
+            context.event_data.get("comment", {}).get("user", {}).get("login", "user")
+        )
+
+        self.logger.info(f"Generating PR summary for PR #{pr_number} at user request")
+
+        # Generate and post summary
+        success = self._generate_pr_summary(context.owner, context.repo, pr_number)
+
+        if success:
+            return AgentResult(
+                success=True,
+                message=f"Generated PR summary for PR #{pr_number}",
+                actions_taken=["Posted PR summary comment"],
+            )
+        else:
+            # Post error message
+            error_msg = (
+                f"@{comment_author}\n\n"
+                f"{self.AI_DISCLAIMER}\n\n"
+                "**⚠️ Summary Generation Failed**\n\n"
+                "I was unable to generate a summary for this PR. "
+                "This could be because:\n"
+                "- The PR has no changes\n"
+                "- There was an error accessing the diff\n"
+                "- The LLM service is unavailable"
+            )
+            self.gitea.create_issue_comment(
+                context.owner, context.repo, pr_number, error_msg
+            )
+
+            return AgentResult(
+                success=False,
+                message=f"Failed to generate PR summary for PR #{pr_number}",
+                error="Summary generation failed",
+            )

tools/ai-review/config.yml

@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ agents:
         events:
             - opened
             - synchronize
+        auto_summary:
+            enabled: true # Auto-generate summary for PRs with empty descriptions
+            post_as_comment: true # true = post as comment, false = update PR description
     codebase:
         enabled: true
         schedule: "0 0 * * 0" # Weekly on Sunday
@@ -63,7 +66,7 @@ interaction:
         - explain
         - suggest
         - security
-        - summarize
+        - summarize # Generate PR summary (works on both issues and PRs)
         - triage
         - review-again
 

tools/ai-review/prompts/pr_summary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+You are an experienced senior software engineer analyzing a pull request diff to generate a comprehensive, informative summary.
+
+Your goal is to create a **clear, structured summary** that helps reviewers quickly understand:
+- What changes were made
+- Why these changes matter
+- Which files and components are affected
+- The type of change (feature/bugfix/refactor/documentation)
+
+---
+
+## Requirements
+
+Analyze the PR diff and generate a summary that includes:
+
+1. **Brief Overview**: 2-3 sentence summary of the changes
+2. **Key Changes**: Bullet points of the most important modifications
+   - What was added
+   - What was modified
+   - What was removed (if applicable)
+3. **Files Affected**: List of changed files with brief descriptions
+4. **Change Type**: Classify as Feature, Bugfix, Refactor, Documentation, Testing, or Mixed
+5. **Impact Assessment**: Brief note on the scope and potential impact
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+Return a JSON object with this structure:
+
+```json
+{{{{
+  "summary": "Brief 2-3 sentence overview of what this PR accomplishes",
+  "change_type": "Feature" | "Bugfix" | "Refactor" | "Documentation" | "Testing" | "Mixed",
+  "key_changes": {{{{
+    "added": ["List of new features/files/functionality added"],
+    "modified": ["List of existing components that were changed"],
+    "removed": ["List of removed features/files (if any)"]
+  }}}},
+  "files_affected": [
+    {{{{
+      "path": "path/to/file.py",
+      "description": "Brief description of changes in this file",
+      "change_type": "added" | "modified" | "deleted"
+    }}}}
+  ],
+  "impact": {{{{
+    "scope": "small" | "medium" | "large",
+    "description": "Brief assessment of the impact and scope of changes"
+  }}}}
+}}}}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Rules
+
+1. **Be concise**: Keep descriptions clear and to the point
+2. **Focus on intent**: Explain *what* and *why*, not just *how*
+3. **Identify patterns**: Group related changes together
+4. **Highlight significance**: Emphasize important architectural or behavioral changes
+5. **Be objective**: Base analysis purely on the code changes
+6. **Output only JSON**: No additional text before or after the JSON object
+
+---
+
+## Diff to Analyze
+