.gitea/workflows/ai-chat.yml

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ jobs:
             !contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot security') &&
             !contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot summarize') &&
             !contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot changelog') &&
+            !contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot explain-diff') &&
             !contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot review-again') &&
             !contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot setup-labels')
         runs-on: ubuntu-latest

.gitea/workflows/ai-comment-reply.yml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 name: AI Comment Reply
 
 # WORKFLOW ROUTING:
-# This workflow handles SPECIFIC commands: help, explain, suggest, security, summarize, changelog, review-again, setup-labels
+# This workflow handles SPECIFIC commands: help, explain, suggest, security, summarize, changelog, explain-diff, review-again, setup-labels
 # Other workflows: ai-issue-triage.yml (@codebot triage), ai-chat.yml (free-form questions)
 
 on:
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ jobs:
              contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot security') ||
              contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot summarize') ||
              contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot changelog') ||
+             contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot explain-diff') ||
              contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot review-again') ||
              contains(github.event.comment.body, '@codebot setup-labels'))
         steps:

CLAUDE.md

@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ Prompts are stored in `tools/ai-review/prompts/` as Markdown files:
 - `base.md` - Base instructions for all reviews
 - `pr_summary.md` - PR summary generation template
 - `changelog.md` - Keep a Changelog format generation template
+- `explain_diff.md` - Plain-language diff explanation template
 - `issue_triage.md` - Issue classification template
 - `issue_response.md` - Issue response template
 
@@ -533,6 +534,79 @@ The `@codebot changelog` command generates Keep a Changelog format entries from
 - Excluded from ai-chat.yml to prevent duplicate runs
 - No automatic triggering - manual command only
 
+### Code Diff Explainer
+
+The `@codebot explain-diff` command translates technical code changes into plain language for non-technical stakeholders.
+
+**Key Features:**
+- Plain-language explanations without jargon
+- File-by-file breakdown with "what" and "why" context
+- Architecture impact analysis
+- Breaking change detection
+- Perfect for PMs, designers, and new team members
+
+**Implementation Details:**
+
+1. **Command Handler** - `PRAgent._handle_explain_diff_command()`:
+   - Triggered by `@codebot explain-diff` in PR comments
+   - Fetches PR title, description, and full diff
+   - Loads `prompts/explain_diff.md` template
+   - Formats prompt with PR context
+
+2. **LLM Analysis** - Generates plain-language JSON:
+   ```json
+   {
+     "overview": "High-level summary in everyday language",
+     "key_changes": [
+       {
+         "file": "path/to/file.py",
+         "status": "new|modified|deleted",
+         "explanation": "What changed (no jargon)",
+         "why_it_matters": "Business/user impact"
+       }
+     ],
+     "architecture_impact": {
+       "description": "System-level effects explained simply",
+       "new_dependencies": ["External libraries added"],
+       "affected_components": ["System parts impacted"]
+     },
+     "breaking_changes": ["User-facing breaking changes"],
+     "technical_details": { /* Stats for reference */ }
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Formatting** - `_format_diff_explanation()`:
+   - Converts JSON to readable markdown
+   - Uses emojis for visual categorization (➕ new, 📝 modified, 🗑️ deleted)
+   - Highlights breaking changes prominently
+   - Includes technical summary for developers
+   - Omits empty sections for clean output
+
+4. **Prompt Engineering** - `prompts/explain_diff.md`:
+   - **Avoids jargon**: "API" → "connection point between systems"
+   - **Explains why**: Not just what changed, but why it matters
+   - **Uses analogies**: "Caching" → "memory system for faster loading"
+   - **Focus on impact**: Who is affected and how
+   - **Groups changes**: Combines related files into themes
+   - **Translates concepts**: Technical terms → everyday language
+
+**Plain Language Rules:**
+- ❌ "Refactored authentication middleware" → ✅ "Updated login system for better security"
+- ❌ "Implemented Redis caching" → ✅ "Added memory to make pages load 10x faster"
+- ❌ "Database migration" → ✅ "Updated how data is stored"
+
+**Common Use Cases:**
+- New team members understanding large PRs
+- Non-technical reviewers (PMs, designers) reviewing features
+- Documenting architectural decisions
+- Learning from other developers' code
+
+**Workflow Safety:**
+- Only triggers on PR comments (not issue comments)
+- Included in ai-comment-reply.yml workflow conditions
+- Excluded from ai-chat.yml to prevent duplicate runs
+- No automatic triggering - manual command only
+
 ### Review-Again Command Implementation
 
 The `@codebot review-again` command allows manual re-triggering of PR reviews without new commits.
@@ -591,6 +665,7 @@ Example commands:
 - `@codebot suggest` - Suggest solutions
 - `@codebot summarize` - Generate PR summary or issue summary (works on both)
 - `@codebot changelog` - Generate Keep a Changelog format entries (PR comments only)
+- `@codebot explain-diff` - Explain code changes in plain language (PR comments only)
 - `@codebot setup-labels` - Automatic label setup (built-in, not in config)
 - `@codebot review-again` - Re-run PR review without new commits (PR comments only)
 

README.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Enterprise-grade AI code review system for **Gitea** with automated PR review, i
 | **PR Summaries** | Auto-generate comprehensive PR summaries with change analysis and impact assessment |
 | **Issue Triage** | On-demand classification, labeling, priority assignment via `@codebot triage` |
 | **Chat** | Interactive AI chat with codebase search and web search tools |
-| **@codebot Commands** | `@codebot summarize`, `changelog`, `explain`, `suggest`, `triage`, `review-again` in comments |
+| **@codebot Commands** | `@codebot summarize`, `changelog`, `explain-diff`, `explain`, `suggest`, `triage`, `review-again` in comments |
 | **Codebase Analysis** | Health scores, tech debt tracking, weekly reports |
 | **Security Scanner** | 17 OWASP-aligned rules for vulnerability detection |
 | **Enterprise Ready** | Audit logging, metrics, Prometheus export |
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ In any PR comment:
 |---------|-------------|
 | `@codebot summarize` | Generate a comprehensive PR summary with changes, files affected, and impact |
 | `@codebot changelog` | Generate Keep a Changelog format entries ready for CHANGELOG.md |
+| `@codebot explain-diff` | Explain code changes in plain language for non-technical stakeholders |
 | `@codebot review-again` | Re-run AI code review on current PR state without new commits |
 
 #### PR Summary (`@codebot summarize`)
@@ -281,6 +282,65 @@ Adds new feature without affecting existing functionality
 - **Main components:** auth/, api/users/, database/
 ```
 
+#### Diff Explainer (`@codebot explain-diff`)
+
+**Features:**
+- 📖 Translates technical changes into plain language
+- 🎯 Perfect for non-technical stakeholders (PMs, designers)
+- 🔍 File-by-file breakdown with "what" and "why"
+- 🏗️ Architecture impact analysis
+- ⚠️ Breaking change detection
+- 📊 Technical summary for reference
+
+**When to use:**
+- New team members reviewing complex PRs
+- Non-technical reviewers need to understand changes
+- Documenting architectural decisions
+- Learning from others' code
+
+**Example output:**
+```markdown
+## 📖 Code Changes Explained (PR #123)
+
+### 🎯 Overview
+This PR adds user authentication using secure tokens that expire after 24 hours, enabling users to log in securely without storing passwords in the application.
+
+### 🔍 What Changed
+
+#### ➕ `auth/jwt.py` (new)
+**What changed:** Creates secure tokens for logged-in users
+**Why it matters:** Enables the app to remember who you are without constantly asking for your password
+
+#### 📝 `api/users.py` (modified)
+**What changed:** Added a login page where users can sign in
+**Why it matters:** Users can now create accounts and access their personal data
+
+---
+
+### 🏗️ Architecture Impact
+Introduces a security layer across the entire application, ensuring only authenticated users can access protected features.
+
+**New dependencies:**
+- PyJWT (for creating secure tokens)
+- bcrypt (for password encryption)
+
+**Affected components:**
+- API (all endpoints now check authentication)
+- Database (added user credentials storage)
+
+---
+
+### ⚠️ Breaking Changes
+- **All API endpoints now require authentication - existing scripts need to be updated**
+
+---
+
+### 📊 Technical Summary
+- **Files changed:** 5
+- **Lines:** +200 / -10
+- **Components:** auth/, api/
+```
+
 #### Review Again (`@codebot review-again`)
 
 **Features:**

tests/test_ai_review.py

@@ -1052,5 +1052,245 @@ class TestChangelogGeneration:
         assert "changelog" in config["interaction"]["commands"]
 
 
+class TestDiffExplanation:
+    """Test diff explanation functionality."""
+
+    def test_explain_diff_prompt_exists(self):
+        """Verify explain_diff.md prompt file exists."""
+        prompt_path = os.path.join(
+            os.path.dirname(__file__),
+            "..",
+            "tools",
+            "ai-review",
+            "prompts",
+            "explain_diff.md",
+        )
+        assert os.path.exists(prompt_path), "explain_diff.md prompt file not found"
+
+    def test_explain_diff_prompt_formatting(self):
+        """Test that explain_diff.md can be formatted with placeholders."""
+        prompt_path = os.path.join(
+            os.path.dirname(__file__),
+            "..",
+            "tools",
+            "ai-review",
+            "prompts",
+            "explain_diff.md",
+        )
+        with open(prompt_path) as f:
+            prompt = f.read()
+
+        # Check for key elements
+        assert "plain language" in prompt.lower() or "plain-language" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "overview" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "key changes" in prompt.lower() or "key_changes" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "architecture" in prompt.lower()
+        assert "JSON" in prompt
+
+        # Should be able to format with pr_title and pr_description
+        try:
+            formatted = prompt.format(
+                pr_title="Test PR Title", pr_description="Test PR Description"
+            )
+            assert "Test PR Title" in formatted
+            assert "Test PR Description" in formatted
+        except KeyError as e:
+            pytest.fail(f"Prompt has unescaped placeholders: {e}")
+
+    def test_pr_agent_can_handle_explain_diff_command(self):
+        """Test that PRAgent can handle @codebot explain-diff in PR comments."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        config = {
+            "agents": {
+                "pr": {
+                    "enabled": True,
+                }
+            },
+            "interaction": {
+                "mention_prefix": "@codebot",
+            },
+        }
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config=config)
+
+        # Test explain-diff command in PR comment
+        event_data = {
+            "action": "created",
+            "issue": {
+                "number": 123,
+                "pull_request": {},  # Indicates this is a PR
+            },
+            "comment": {
+                "body": "@codebot explain-diff please",
+            },
+        }
+
+        assert agent.can_handle("issue_comment", event_data) is True
+
+    def test_pr_agent_can_handle_explain_diff_case_insensitive(self):
+        """Test that explain-diff command is case-insensitive."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        config = {
+            "agents": {
+                "pr": {
+                    "enabled": True,
+                }
+            },
+            "interaction": {
+                "mention_prefix": "@codebot",
+            },
+        }
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config=config)
+
+        # Test various casings
+        for body in [
+            "@codebot EXPLAIN-DIFF",
+            "@codebot Explain-Diff",
+            "@codebot ExPlAiN-dIfF",
+        ]:
+            event_data = {
+                "action": "created",
+                "issue": {
+                    "number": 123,
+                    "pull_request": {},
+                },
+                "comment": {"body": body},
+            }
+            assert agent.can_handle("issue_comment", event_data) is True
+
+    def test_pr_agent_ignores_explain_diff_on_non_pr(self):
+        """Test that explain-diff command is ignored on regular issues."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        config = {
+            "agents": {
+                "pr": {
+                    "enabled": True,
+                }
+            },
+            "interaction": {
+                "mention_prefix": "@codebot",
+            },
+        }
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config=config)
+
+        # Regular issue (no pull_request field)
+        event_data = {
+            "action": "created",
+            "issue": {
+                "number": 123,
+                # No pull_request field
+            },
+            "comment": {
+                "body": "@codebot explain-diff",
+            },
+        }
+
+        assert agent.can_handle("issue_comment", event_data) is False
+
+    def test_format_diff_explanation_structure(self):
+        """Test _format_diff_explanation generates correct structure."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config={})
+
+        explanation_data = {
+            "overview": "This PR adds user authentication using JWT tokens",
+            "key_changes": [
+                {
+                    "file": "auth/jwt.py",
+                    "status": "new",
+                    "explanation": "Creates JSON Web Tokens for authenticated users",
+                    "why_it_matters": "Enables secure stateless authentication",
+                },
+                {
+                    "file": "api/users.py",
+                    "status": "modified",
+                    "explanation": "Added login endpoint",
+                    "why_it_matters": "Users can now authenticate",
+                },
+            ],
+            "architecture_impact": {
+                "description": "Introduces authentication layer across all API endpoints",
+                "new_dependencies": ["PyJWT", "bcrypt"],
+                "affected_components": ["API", "Database"],
+            },
+            "breaking_changes": ["All API endpoints now require authentication"],
+            "technical_details": {
+                "files_changed": 5,
+                "insertions": 200,
+                "deletions": 10,
+                "main_components": ["auth/", "api/"],
+            },
+        }
+
+        result = agent._format_diff_explanation(explanation_data, 123)
+
+        # Verify structure
+        assert "## 📖 Code Changes Explained (PR #123)" in result
+        assert "### 🎯 Overview" in result
+        assert "user authentication using JWT tokens" in result
+        assert "### 🔍 What Changed" in result
+        assert "➕ `auth/jwt.py` (new)" in result
+        assert "📝 `api/users.py` (modified)" in result
+        assert "**What changed:**" in result
+        assert "**Why it matters:**" in result
+        assert "### 🏗️ Architecture Impact" in result
+        assert "PyJWT" in result
+        assert "### ⚠️ Breaking Changes" in result
+        assert "All API endpoints now require authentication" in result
+        assert "### 📊 Technical Summary" in result
+        assert "Files changed:** 5" in result
+        assert "+200 / -10" in result
+
+    def test_format_diff_explanation_empty_sections(self):
+        """Test that empty sections are not included in output."""
+        from agents.pr_agent import PRAgent
+
+        agent = PRAgent(config={})
+
+        explanation_data = {
+            "overview": "Small bugfix",
+            "key_changes": [
+                {
+                    "file": "app.py",
+                    "status": "modified",
+                    "explanation": "Fixed typo",
+                    "why_it_matters": "",
+                }
+            ],
+            "architecture_impact": {},
+            "breaking_changes": [],
+            "technical_details": {},
+        }
+
+        result = agent._format_diff_explanation(explanation_data, 123)
+
+        # Only overview and key changes should be present
+        assert "### 🎯 Overview" in result
+        assert "### 🔍 What Changed" in result
+        assert "### 🏗️ Architecture Impact" not in result
+        assert "### ⚠️ Breaking Changes" not in result
+
+    def test_config_has_explain_diff_command(self):
+        """Verify config.yml has explain-diff command."""
+        config_path = os.path.join(
+            os.path.dirname(__file__), "..", "tools", "ai-review", "config.yml"
+        )
+
+        import yaml
+
+        with open(config_path) as f:
+            config = yaml.safe_load(f)
+
+        assert "interaction" in config
+        assert "commands" in config["interaction"]
+        assert "explain-diff" in config["interaction"]["commands"]
+
+
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     pytest.main([__file__, "-v"])

tools/ai-review/agents/pr_agent.py

@@ -100,7 +100,15 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
                 )
                 has_summarize = f"{mention_prefix} summarize" in comment_body.lower()
                 has_changelog = f"{mention_prefix} changelog" in comment_body.lower()
-                return is_pr and (has_review_again or has_summarize or has_changelog)
+                has_explain_diff = (
+                    f"{mention_prefix} explain-diff" in comment_body.lower()
+                )
+                return is_pr and (
+                    has_review_again
+                    or has_summarize
+                    or has_changelog
+                    or has_explain_diff
+                )
 
         return False
 
@@ -116,6 +124,8 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
                 return self._handle_summarize_command(context)
             elif f"{mention_prefix} changelog" in comment_body.lower():
                 return self._handle_changelog_command(context)
+            elif f"{mention_prefix} explain-diff" in comment_body.lower():
+                return self._handle_explain_diff_command(context)
             elif f"{mention_prefix} review-again" in comment_body.lower():
                 return self._handle_review_again(context)
 
@@ -1211,3 +1221,193 @@ class PRAgent(BaseAgent):
                 lines.append(f"- **Main components:** {', '.join(components)}")
 
         return "\n".join(lines)
+
+    def _handle_explain_diff_command(self, context: AgentContext) -> AgentResult:
+        """Handle @codebot explain-diff command from PR comments.
+
+        Generates plain-language explanation of code changes for non-technical stakeholders.
+
+        Args:
+            context: Agent context with event data
+
+        Returns:
+            AgentResult with success status and actions taken
+        """
+        issue = context.event_data.get("issue", {})
+        pr_number = issue.get("number")
+        comment_author = (
+            context.event_data.get("comment", {}).get("user", {}).get("login", "user")
+        )
+
+        self.logger.info(
+            f"Generating diff explanation for PR #{pr_number} at user request"
+        )
+
+        try:
+            # Get PR data
+            pr = self.gitea.get_pull_request(context.owner, context.repo, pr_number)
+            pr_title = pr.get("title", "")
+            pr_description = pr.get("body", "")
+
+            # Get PR diff
+            diff = self._get_diff(context.owner, context.repo, pr_number)
+            if not diff.strip():
+                error_msg = (
+                    f"@{comment_author}\n\n"
+                    f"{self.AI_DISCLAIMER}\n\n"
+                    "**⚠️ Diff Explanation Failed**\n\n"
+                    "No changes found in this PR to explain."
+                )
+                self.gitea.create_issue_comment(
+                    context.owner, context.repo, pr_number, error_msg
+                )
+                return AgentResult(
+                    success=False,
+                    message=f"No diff to explain for PR #{pr_number}",
+                )
+
+            # Load explain_diff prompt
+            prompt_template = self.load_prompt("explain_diff")
+            prompt = prompt_template.format(
+                pr_title=pr_title,
+                pr_description=pr_description or "(No description provided)",
+            )
+            prompt = f"{prompt}\n{diff}"
+
+            # Call LLM to generate explanation
+            result = self.call_llm_json(prompt)
+
+            # Format the explanation comment
+            explanation_comment = self._format_diff_explanation(result, pr_number)
+
+            # Post explanation comment
+            self.gitea.create_issue_comment(
+                context.owner, context.repo, pr_number, explanation_comment
+            )
+
+            return AgentResult(
+                success=True,
+                message=f"Generated diff explanation for PR #{pr_number}",
+                actions_taken=["Posted diff explanation comment"],
+            )
+
+        except Exception as e:
+            self.logger.error(f"Failed to generate diff explanation: {e}")
+
+            # Post error message
+            error_msg = (
+                f"@{comment_author}\n\n"
+                f"{self.AI_DISCLAIMER}\n\n"
+                "**⚠️ Diff Explanation Failed**\n\n"
+                f"I encountered an error while generating the explanation: {str(e)}\n\n"
+                "This could be due to:\n"
+                "- The PR is too large to analyze\n"
+                "- The LLM service is temporarily unavailable\n"
+                "- An unexpected error occurred"
+            )
+            self.gitea.create_issue_comment(
+                context.owner, context.repo, pr_number, error_msg
+            )
+
+            return AgentResult(
+                success=False,
+                message=f"Failed to generate diff explanation for PR #{pr_number}",
+                error=str(e),
+            )
+
+    def _format_diff_explanation(self, explanation_data: dict, pr_number: int) -> str:
+        """Format diff explanation data into readable markdown.
+
+        Args:
+            explanation_data: JSON data from LLM containing explanation
+            pr_number: PR number for reference
+
+        Returns:
+            Formatted markdown explanation
+        """
+        lines = [
+            self.AI_DISCLAIMER,
+            "",
+            f"## 📖 Code Changes Explained (PR #{pr_number})",
+            "",
+        ]
+
+        # Overview
+        overview = explanation_data.get("overview", "")
+        if overview:
+            lines.append("### 🎯 Overview")
+            lines.append(overview)
+            lines.append("")
+
+        # Key changes
+        key_changes = explanation_data.get("key_changes", [])
+        if key_changes:
+            lines.append("### 🔍 What Changed")
+            lines.append("")
+            for change in key_changes:
+                file_path = change.get("file", "unknown")
+                status = change.get("status", "modified")
+                explanation = change.get("explanation", "")
+                why_it_matters = change.get("why_it_matters", "")
+
+                # Status emoji
+                status_emoji = {"new": "➕", "modified": "📝", "deleted": "🗑️"}
+                emoji = status_emoji.get(status, "📝")
+
+                lines.append(f"#### {emoji} `{file_path}` ({status})")
+                lines.append(f"**What changed:** {explanation}")
+                if why_it_matters:
+                    lines.append(f"**Why it matters:** {why_it_matters}")
+                lines.append("")
+
+        # Architecture impact
+        arch_impact = explanation_data.get("architecture_impact", {})
+        if arch_impact and arch_impact.get("description"):
+            lines.append("---")
+            lines.append("")
+            lines.append("### 🏗️ Architecture Impact")
+            lines.append(arch_impact.get("description", ""))
+            lines.append("")
+
+            new_deps = arch_impact.get("new_dependencies", [])
+            if new_deps:
+                lines.append("**New dependencies:**")
+                for dep in new_deps:
+                    lines.append(f"- {dep}")
+                lines.append("")
+
+            affected = arch_impact.get("affected_components", [])
+            if affected:
+                lines.append("**Affected components:**")
+                for comp in affected:
+                    lines.append(f"- {comp}")
+                lines.append("")
+
+        # Breaking changes
+        breaking = explanation_data.get("breaking_changes", [])
+        if breaking:
+            lines.append("---")
+            lines.append("")
+            lines.append("### ⚠️ Breaking Changes")
+            for change in breaking:
+                lines.append(f"- **{change}**")
+            lines.append("")
+
+        # Technical details
+        tech = explanation_data.get("technical_details", {})
+        if tech:
+            lines.append("---")
+            lines.append("")
+            lines.append("### 📊 Technical Summary")
+
+            files = tech.get("files_changed", 0)
+            additions = tech.get("insertions", 0)
+            deletions = tech.get("deletions", 0)
+            lines.append(f"- **Files changed:** {files}")
+            lines.append(f"- **Lines:** +{additions} / -{deletions}")
+
+            components = tech.get("main_components", [])
+            if components:
+                lines.append(f"- **Components:** {', '.join(components)}")
+
+        return "\n".join(lines)

tools/ai-review/config.yml

@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ interaction:
         - security
         - summarize # Generate PR summary (works on both issues and PRs)
         - changelog # Generate Keep a Changelog format entries (PR comments only)
+        - explain-diff # Explain code changes in plain language (PR comments only)
         - triage
         - review-again
 

tools/ai-review/prompts/explain_diff.md

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+You are an experienced technical writer explaining code changes to **non-technical stakeholders** (product managers, designers, business analysts).
+
+Your goal is to translate complex code diffs into **clear, plain-language explanations** that anyone can understand, regardless of their technical background.
+
+---
+
+## Requirements
+
+Analyze the PR diff and generate a structured explanation with:
+
+1. **Overview** - High-level summary in 1-2 sentences (what changed and why)
+2. **Key Changes** - File-by-file breakdown in plain language
+3. **Architecture Impact** - How this affects the overall system
+4. **Breaking Changes** - Any changes that affect existing functionality (if applicable)
+5. **Technical Details** - Summary of files, lines, and components (for reference)
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+Return a JSON object with this structure:
+
+```json
+{{{{
+  "overview": "One or two sentence summary of what this PR accomplishes",
+  "key_changes": [
+    {{{{
+      "file": "path/to/file.py",
+      "status": "new" | "modified" | "deleted",
+      "explanation": "Plain language explanation of what changed in this file",
+      "why_it_matters": "Why this change is important or what problem it solves"
+    }}}}
+  ],
+  "architecture_impact": {{{{
+    "description": "How this affects the overall system architecture",
+    "new_dependencies": ["List of new libraries or services added"],
+    "affected_components": ["List of system components that are impacted"]
+  }}}},
+  "breaking_changes": [
+    "List of changes that break backward compatibility or affect existing features"
+  ],
+  "technical_details": {{{{
+    "files_changed": 15,
+    "insertions": 450,
+    "deletions": 120,
+    "main_components": ["List of main directories/components affected"]
+  }}}}
+}}}}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Rules for Plain Language Explanations
+
+1. **Avoid jargon**: Use everyday language, not technical terms
+   - ❌ Bad: "Refactored the authentication middleware to use JWT tokens"
+   - ✅ Good: "Updated the login system to use secure tokens that expire after 24 hours"
+
+2. **Explain the "why", not just the "what"**
+   - ❌ Bad: "Added new function `calculate_total()`"
+   - ✅ Good: "Added calculation logic to automatically sum up order totals, preventing manual errors"
+
+3. **Use analogies and real-world examples**
+   - ❌ Bad: "Implemented caching layer using Redis"
+   - ✅ Good: "Added a memory system that remembers frequently accessed data, making the app load 10x faster"
+
+4. **Focus on user impact**
+   - ❌ Bad: "Optimized database queries"
+   - ✅ Good: "Made the search feature faster by improving how we retrieve data"
+
+5. **Group related changes together**
+   - Instead of listing 10 small files, say "Updated 10 files across the payment system to fix checkout bugs"
+
+6. **Be specific about impact**
+   - "This change affects all users on the mobile app"
+   - "This only impacts admin users"
+   - "This is internal cleanup with no user-visible changes"
+
+7. **Translate technical concepts**
+   - API → "connection point between systems"
+   - Database migration → "updating how data is stored"
+   - Refactoring → "cleaning up code without changing behavior"
+   - Dependency → "external library or tool we use"
+
+8. **Highlight risks clearly**
+   - "This requires a system restart"
+   - "Users will need to log in again"
+   - "This changes how existing features work"
+
+---
+
+## PR Information
+
+**Title:** {pr_title}
+
+**Description:** {pr_description}
+
+**Diff:**
+